Hi all,
The bug in 2.0.6 should have been identified in the code review and testing phase - and I feel like we got some egg on our face as a result. I wanted to take a moment to comment on it, and apologize.
The fact that this bug, being fairly big and obvious, got through the process reflects that I've been a bit lax in reviews and testing. I'm personally going to change my review and approval process to try to resolve these issues, through a more formal off-trunk review.
Bahamut as a project is effectively in a maintenance phase, as we don't have anyone working on it as actively as we previously have. We release new versions sporadically, and don't have a roadmap or any "next big thing". This is actually part of the problem - without goals, we have a lot fewer eyes on individual changes, and we're not all driving towards anything.
So with that said, I'd like to put it to the community to discuss what we could put on our roadmap. Little things and big things. Let's brainstorm - what would you like to see in Bahamut? And out of this discussion, maybe we can line up a roadmap for 2.1, 2.2 and maybe even a 3.0.
What would you like to see in Bahamut?
-Aaron
We've gotten some comments/suggestions over the last year or so about becoming more "IRCv3" compliant...More info available here:
And I know we've beaten this to death before, but I'm still very much in favor of some sort of user hostmasking, whether hash-based in the ircd, or tied to services - in such a way where staff (and law enforcement if necessary) would still be able to see real IPs. :)
Brandon
brandon@dalnet [irc.dal.net] Routing & Peering Team Lead
On 5/24/2013 8:27 AM, Aaron Wiebe wrote:
Hi all,
The bug in 2.0.6 should have been identified in the code review and testing phase - and I feel like we got some egg on our face as a result. I wanted to take a moment to comment on it, and apologize.
The fact that this bug, being fairly big and obvious, got through the process reflects that I've been a bit lax in reviews and testing. I'm personally going to change my review and approval process to try to resolve these issues, through a more formal off-trunk review.
Bahamut as a project is effectively in a maintenance phase, as we don't have anyone working on it as actively as we previously have. We release new versions sporadically, and don't have a roadmap or any "next big thing". This is actually part of the problem - without goals, we have a lot fewer eyes on individual changes, and we're not all driving towards anything.
So with that said, I'd like to put it to the community to discuss what we could put on our roadmap. Little things and big things. Let's brainstorm - what would you like to see in Bahamut? And out of this discussion, maybe we can line up a roadmap for 2.1, 2.2 and maybe even a 3.0.
What would you like to see in Bahamut?
-Aaron
Hostmasking remains one of the most popular requests users raise in #help as well. If we are to be committed to providing an experience to users that is one they appreciate and like, providing basic security measures should be considered. As for other feature suggestions, I think that sort of depends on the direction IRC as a whole is going. I haven't been following a lot of the discussions lately, so I'm unsure of exactly how much modernization we may be looking to implement.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:34 AM, brandon brandon@dal.net wrote:
We've gotten some comments/suggestions over the last year or so about becoming more "IRCv3" compliant...More info available here:
And I know we've beaten this to death before, but I'm still very much in favor of some sort of user hostmasking, whether hash-based in the ircd, or tied to services - in such a way where staff (and law enforcement if necessary) would still be able to see real IPs. :)
Brandon
brandon@dalnet [irc.dal.net] Routing & Peering Team Lead
On 5/24/2013 8:27 AM, Aaron Wiebe wrote:
Hi all,
The bug in 2.0.6 should have been identified in the code review and testing phase - and I feel like we got some egg on our face as a result. I wanted to take a moment to comment on it, and apologize.
The fact that this bug, being fairly big and obvious, got through the process reflects that I've been a bit lax in reviews and testing. I'm personally going to change my review and approval process to try to resolve these issues, through a more formal off-trunk review.
Bahamut as a project is effectively in a maintenance phase, as we don't have anyone working on it as actively as we previously have. We release new versions sporadically, and don't have a roadmap or any "next big thing". This is actually part of the problem - without goals, we have a lot fewer eyes on individual changes, and we're not all driving towards anything.
So with that said, I'd like to put it to the community to discuss what we could put on our roadmap. Little things and big things. Let's brainstorm - what would you like to see in Bahamut? And out of this discussion, maybe we can line up a roadmap for 2.1, 2.2 and maybe even a 3.0.
What would you like to see in Bahamut?
-Aaron
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
I too, am very much in favor of IRCv3 and user host masking.
-----Original Message----- From: dalnet-src-bounces@lists.dal.net [mailto:dalnet-src-bounces@lists.dal.net] On Behalf Of brandon Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 8:34 AM To: dalnet-src@dal.net Subject: [DALnet-src] Re: Recent Bahamut changes
We've gotten some comments/suggestions over the last year or so about becoming more "IRCv3" compliant...More info available here:
And I know we've beaten this to death before, but I'm still very much in favor of some sort of user hostmasking, whether hash-based in the ircd, or tied to services - in such a way where staff (and law enforcement if necessary) would still be able to see real IPs. :)
Brandon
brandon@dalnet [irc.dal.net] Routing & Peering Team Lead
On 5/24/2013 8:27 AM, Aaron Wiebe wrote:
Hi all,
The bug in 2.0.6 should have been identified in the code review and testing phase - and I feel like we got some egg on our face as a result. I wanted to take a moment to comment on it, and apologize.
The fact that this bug, being fairly big and obvious, got through the process reflects that I've been a bit lax in reviews and testing. I'm personally going to change my review and approval process to try to resolve these issues, through a more formal off-trunk review.
Bahamut as a project is effectively in a maintenance phase, as we don't have anyone working on it as actively as we previously have. We release new versions sporadically, and don't have a roadmap or any "next big thing". This is actually part of the problem - without goals, we have a lot fewer eyes on individual changes, and we're not all driving towards anything.
So with that said, I'd like to put it to the community to discuss what we could put on our roadmap. Little things and big things. Let's brainstorm - what would you like to see in Bahamut? And out of this discussion, maybe we can line up a roadmap for 2.1, 2.2 and maybe even a 3.0.
What would you like to see in Bahamut?
-Aaron
_______________________________________________ DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
Bahamut to a degree has hostmasking already. It's called svshost where a unlined server sets it. Integrating hostmasking into nickserv would be neat.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 24, 2013, at 6:34, brandon brandon@DAL.NET wrote:
We've gotten some comments/suggestions over the last year or so about becoming more "IRCv3" compliant...More info available here:
And I know we've beaten this to death before, but I'm still very much in favor of some sort of user hostmasking, whether hash-based in the ircd, or tied to services - in such a way where staff (and law enforcement if necessary) would still be able to see real IPs. :)
Brandon
brandon@dalnet [irc.dal.net] Routing & Peering Team Lead
On 5/24/2013 8:27 AM, Aaron Wiebe wrote:
Hi all,
The bug in 2.0.6 should have been identified in the code review and testing phase - and I feel like we got some egg on our face as a result. I wanted to take a moment to comment on it, and apologize.
The fact that this bug, being fairly big and obvious, got through the process reflects that I've been a bit lax in reviews and testing. I'm personally going to change my review and approval process to try to resolve these issues, through a more formal off-trunk review.
Bahamut as a project is effectively in a maintenance phase, as we don't have anyone working on it as actively as we previously have. We release new versions sporadically, and don't have a roadmap or any "next big thing". This is actually part of the problem - without goals, we have a lot fewer eyes on individual changes, and we're not all driving towards anything.
So with that said, I'd like to put it to the community to discuss what we could put on our roadmap. Little things and big things. Let's brainstorm - what would you like to see in Bahamut? And out of this discussion, maybe we can line up a roadmap for 2.1, 2.2 and maybe even a 3.0.
What would you like to see in Bahamut?
-Aaron
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
So this thread has quieted down now.
This is what I captured:
- DNSBL integration ** Possibly by way of separate access checking daemon - IRCv3 support - User Hostmasking
Anything else?
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Holbrook Bunting srd@powertrip.net wrote:
Bahamut to a degree has hostmasking already. It's called svshost where a unlined server sets it. Integrating hostmasking into nickserv would be neat.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 24, 2013, at 6:34, brandon brandon@DAL.NET wrote:
We've gotten some comments/suggestions over the last year or so about becoming more "IRCv3" compliant...More info available here:
And I know we've beaten this to death before, but I'm still very much in favor of some sort of user hostmasking, whether hash-based in the ircd, or tied to services - in such a way where staff (and law enforcement if necessary) would still be able to see real IPs. :)
Brandon
brandon@dalnet [irc.dal.net] Routing & Peering Team Lead
On 5/24/2013 8:27 AM, Aaron Wiebe wrote:
Hi all,
The bug in 2.0.6 should have been identified in the code review and testing phase - and I feel like we got some egg on our face as a result. I wanted to take a moment to comment on it, and apologize.
The fact that this bug, being fairly big and obvious, got through the process reflects that I've been a bit lax in reviews and testing. I'm personally going to change my review and approval process to try to resolve these issues, through a more formal off-trunk review.
Bahamut as a project is effectively in a maintenance phase, as we don't have anyone working on it as actively as we previously have. We release new versions sporadically, and don't have a roadmap or any "next big thing". This is actually part of the problem - without goals, we have a lot fewer eyes on individual changes, and we're not all driving towards anything.
So with that said, I'd like to put it to the community to discuss what we could put on our roadmap. Little things and big things. Let's brainstorm - what would you like to see in Bahamut? And out of this discussion, maybe we can line up a roadmap for 2.1, 2.2 and maybe even a 3.0.
What would you like to see in Bahamut?
-Aaron
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
Facebook integration?
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Aaron Wiebe epiphani@gmail.com wrote:
************So this thread has quieted down now.
This is what I captured:
**- DNSBL integration ** ** Possibly by way of separate access checking daemon **- IRCv3 support **- User Hostmasking
**Anything else?
**On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Holbrook Bunting **srd@powertrip.net*
- wrote:
Bahamut to a degree has hostmasking already. It's called svshost where a unlined server sets it. Integrating hostmasking into nickserv would be neat.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 24, 2013, at 6:34, brandon brandon@DAL.NET wrote:
We've gotten some comments/suggestions over the last year or so about becoming more "IRCv3" compliant...More info available here:
And I know we've beaten this to death before, but I'm still very much in favor of some sort of user hostmasking, whether hash-based in the ircd, or tied to services - in such a way where staff (and law enforcement if necessary) would still be able to see real IPs. :)
Brandon
brandon@dalnet [irc.dal.net] Routing & Peering Team Lead
On 5/24/2013 8:27 AM, Aaron Wiebe wrote:
Hi all,
The bug in 2.0.6 should have been identified in the code review and testing phase - and I feel like we got some egg on our face as a result. I wanted to take a moment to comment on it, and apologize.
The fact that this bug, being fairly big and obvious, got through the process reflects that I've been a bit lax in reviews and testing. I'm personally going to change my review and approval process to try to resolve these issues, through a more formal off-trunk review.
Bahamut as a project is effectively in a maintenance phase, as we don't have anyone working on it as actively as we previously have. We
release
new versions sporadically, and don't have a roadmap or any "next big thing". This is actually part of the problem - without goals, we have
a
lot fewer eyes on individual changes, and we're not all driving towards anything.
So with that said, I'd like to put it to the community to discuss what we could put on our roadmap. Little things and big things. Let's brainstorm - what would you like to see in Bahamut? And out of this discussion, maybe we can line up a roadmap for 2.1, 2.2 and maybe even
a
3.0.
What would you like to see in Bahamut?
-Aaron
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
** **
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
HI These things are great to be work with let us have this experience then we will discuss new things later on and yea Vin’s suggestion is good ahahaha. Regards, Jazzzzz From: Aaron Wiebe Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 8:52 Asif To: Holbrook Bunting Cc: dalnet-src@dal.net ; brandon Subject: Re: [DALnet-src] Re: Recent Bahamut changes
So this thread has quieted down now.
This is what I captured:
- DNSBL integration ** Possibly by way of separate access checking daemon - IRCv3 support - User Hostmasking
Anything else?
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Holbrook Bunting srd@powertrip.net wrote:
Bahamut to a degree has hostmasking already. It's called svshost where a unlined server sets it. Integrating hostmasking into nickserv would be neat.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 24, 2013, at 6:34, brandon brandon@DAL.NET wrote:
We've gotten some comments/suggestions over the last year or so about becoming more "IRCv3" compliant...More info available here:
And I know we've beaten this to death before, but I'm still very much in favor of some sort of user hostmasking, whether hash-based in the ircd, or tied to services - in such a way where staff (and law enforcement if necessary) would still be able to see real IPs. :)
Brandon
brandon@dalnet [irc.dal.net] Routing & Peering Team Lead
On 5/24/2013 8:27 AM, Aaron Wiebe wrote:
Hi all,
The bug in 2.0.6 should have been identified in the code review and testing phase - and I feel like we got some egg on our face as a result. I wanted to take a moment to comment on it, and apologize.
The fact that this bug, being fairly big and obvious, got through the process reflects that I've been a bit lax in reviews and testing. I'm personally going to change my review and approval process to try to resolve these issues, through a more formal off-trunk review.
Bahamut as a project is effectively in a maintenance phase, as we don't have anyone working on it as actively as we previously have. We release new versions sporadically, and don't have a roadmap or any "next big thing". This is actually part of the problem - without goals, we have a lot fewer eyes on individual changes, and we're not all driving towards anything.
So with that said, I'd like to put it to the community to discuss what we could put on our roadmap. Little things and big things. Let's brainstorm - what would you like to see in Bahamut? And out of this discussion, maybe we can line up a roadmap for 2.1, 2.2 and maybe even a 3.0.
What would you like to see in Bahamut?
-Aaron
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
_______________________________________________ DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
I'd love to say it was entirely tongue in cheek, but the reality is that IRC has suffered highly as a result of Facebook. Finding a way to integrate the two platforms may rekindle interest.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Dreamhealer dreamhealer@hotmail.co.ukwrote:
** ** ** **HI**** ** **These things are great to be work with let us have this experience then we will discuss new things later on and yea Vin’s suggestion is good ahahaha. **** ** ** **** ** **Regards,**** ** **Jazzzzz **** ** **** ** ** ***From:* Aaron Wiebe epiphani@gmail.com ** ***Sent:*Monday, May 27, 2013 8:52 Asif ** ***To:* Holbrook Bunting srd@powertrip.net ** ***Cc:* dalnet-src@dal.net ; brandon brandon@dal.net ** ***Subject:* Re: [DALnet-src] Re: Recent Bahamut changes****** ** **** **So this thread has quieted down now.
This is what I captured:
**- DNSBL integration ** ** Possibly by way of separate access checking daemon **- IRCv3 support **- User Hostmasking
**Anything else?
**On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Holbrook Bunting **srd@powertrip.net*
- wrote:
Bahamut to a degree has hostmasking already. It's called svshost where a unlined server sets it. Integrating hostmasking into nickserv would be neat.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 24, 2013, at 6:34, brandon brandon@DAL.NET wrote:
We've gotten some comments/suggestions over the last year or so about becoming more "IRCv3" compliant...More info available here:
And I know we've beaten this to death before, but I'm still very much in favor of some sort of user hostmasking, whether hash-based in the ircd, or tied to services - in such a way where staff (and law enforcement if necessary) would still be able to see real IPs. :)
Brandon
brandon@dalnet [irc.dal.net] Routing & Peering Team Lead
On 5/24/2013 8:27 AM, Aaron Wiebe wrote:
Hi all,
The bug in 2.0.6 should have been identified in the code review and testing phase - and I feel like we got some egg on our face as a result. I wanted to take a moment to comment on it, and apologize.
The fact that this bug, being fairly big and obvious, got through the process reflects that I've been a bit lax in reviews and testing. I'm personally going to change my review and approval process to try to resolve these issues, through a more formal off-trunk review.
Bahamut as a project is effectively in a maintenance phase, as we don't have anyone working on it as actively as we previously have. We
release
new versions sporadically, and don't have a roadmap or any "next big thing". This is actually part of the problem - without goals, we have
a
lot fewer eyes on individual changes, and we're not all driving towards anything.
So with that said, I'd like to put it to the community to discuss what we could put on our roadmap. Little things and big things. Let's brainstorm - what would you like to see in Bahamut? And out of this discussion, maybe we can line up a roadmap for 2.1, 2.2 and maybe even
a
3.0.
What would you like to see in Bahamut?
-Aaron
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
** **
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
Totally agreed - but I'm afraid that is impossible to do that communication between both entirely different platform work together but if it happens that woul be a great turn for DALnet and its user strength !
Regards, Jazzzzz Sent from my iPhone
On 27-May-2013, at 10:15 PM, "Vin King" vin.king@gmail.com wrote:
I'd love to say it was entirely tongue in cheek, but the reality is that IRC has suffered highly as a result of Facebook. Finding a way to integrate the two platforms may rekindle interest.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Dreamhealer dreamhealer@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
HI These things are great to be work with let us have this experience then we will discuss new things later on and yea Vin’s suggestion is good ahahaha. Regards, Jazzzzz From: Aaron Wiebe Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 8:52 Asif To: Holbrook Bunting Cc: dalnet-src@dal.net ; brandon Subject: Re: [DALnet-src] Re: Recent Bahamut changes So this thread has quieted down now.
This is what I captured:
- DNSBL integration ** Possibly by way of separate access checking daemon
- IRCv3 support
- User Hostmasking
Anything else?
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Holbrook Bunting srd@powertrip.net wrote:
Bahamut to a degree has hostmasking already. It's called svshost where a unlined server sets it. Integrating hostmasking into nickserv would be neat.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 24, 2013, at 6:34, brandon brandon@DAL.NET wrote:
We've gotten some comments/suggestions over the last year or so about becoming more "IRCv3" compliant...More info available here:
And I know we've beaten this to death before, but I'm still very much in favor of some sort of user hostmasking, whether hash-based in the ircd, or tied to services - in such a way where staff (and law enforcement if necessary) would still be able to see real IPs. :)
Brandon
brandon@dalnet [irc.dal.net] Routing & Peering Team Lead
On 5/24/2013 8:27 AM, Aaron Wiebe wrote:
Hi all,
The bug in 2.0.6 should have been identified in the code review and testing phase - and I feel like we got some egg on our face as a result. I wanted to take a moment to comment on it, and apologize.
The fact that this bug, being fairly big and obvious, got through the process reflects that I've been a bit lax in reviews and testing. I'm personally going to change my review and approval process to try to resolve these issues, through a more formal off-trunk review.
Bahamut as a project is effectively in a maintenance phase, as we don't have anyone working on it as actively as we previously have. We release new versions sporadically, and don't have a roadmap or any "next big thing". This is actually part of the problem - without goals, we have a lot fewer eyes on individual changes, and we're not all driving towards anything.
So with that said, I'd like to put it to the community to discuss what we could put on our roadmap. Little things and big things. Let's brainstorm - what would you like to see in Bahamut? And out of this discussion, maybe we can line up a roadmap for 2.1, 2.2 and maybe even a 3.0.
What would you like to see in Bahamut?
-Aaron
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
That's not true. Facebook has a robust API for applications. The trick is figuring out what we'd do with it.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Asif Ali Baig dreamhealer@hotmail.co.ukwrote:
Totally agreed - but I'm afraid that is impossible to do that communication between both entirely different platform work together but if it happens that woul be a great turn for DALnet and its user strength !
Regards, Jazzzzz Sent from my iPhone
On 27-May-2013, at 10:15 PM, "Vin King" vin.king@gmail.com wrote:
I'd love to say it was entirely tongue in cheek, but the reality is that IRC has suffered highly as a result of Facebook. Finding a way to integrate the two platforms may rekindle interest.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Dreamhealer dreamhealer@hotmail.co.ukwrote:
** ** ** **HI**** ** **These things are great to be work with let us have this experience then we will discuss new things later on and yea Vin’s suggestion is good ahahaha. **** ** ** **** ** **Regards,**** ** ** Jazzzzz**** ** **** ** ** ***From:* Aaron Wiebe epiphani@gmail.com ** * **Sent:* Monday, May 27, 2013 8:52 Asif** ***To:* Holbrook Buntingsrd@powertrip.net ** ***Cc:* dalnet-src@dal.net ; brandon brandon@dal.net ** ***Subject:*Re: [DALnet-src] Re: Recent Bahamut changes ****** ** **** **So this thread has quieted down now.
This is what I captured:
**- DNSBL integration ** ** Possibly by way of separate access checking daemon **- IRCv3 support **- User Hostmasking
**Anything else?
**On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Holbrook Bunting **srd@powertrip.net ** wrote:
Bahamut to a degree has hostmasking already. It's called svshost where a unlined server sets it. Integrating hostmasking into nickserv would be neat.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 24, 2013, at 6:34, brandon brandon@DAL.NET wrote:
We've gotten some comments/suggestions over the last year or so about becoming more "IRCv3" compliant...More info available here:
And I know we've beaten this to death before, but I'm still very much
in
favor of some sort of user hostmasking, whether hash-based in the ircd, or tied to services - in such a way where staff (and law enforcement if necessary) would still be able to see real IPs. :)
Brandon
brandon@dalnet [irc.dal.net] Routing & Peering Team Lead
On 5/24/2013 8:27 AM, Aaron Wiebe wrote:
Hi all,
The bug in 2.0.6 should have been identified in the code review and testing phase - and I feel like we got some egg on our face as a result. I wanted to take a moment to comment on it, and apologize.
The fact that this bug, being fairly big and obvious, got through the process reflects that I've been a bit lax in reviews and testing. I'm personally going to change my review and approval process to try to resolve these issues, through a more formal off-trunk review.
Bahamut as a project is effectively in a maintenance phase, as we
don't
have anyone working on it as actively as we previously have. We
release
new versions sporadically, and don't have a roadmap or any "next big thing". This is actually part of the problem - without goals, we
have a
lot fewer eyes on individual changes, and we're not all driving
towards
anything.
So with that said, I'd like to put it to the community to discuss what we could put on our roadmap. Little things and big things. Let's brainstorm - what would you like to see in Bahamut? And out of this discussion, maybe we can line up a roadmap for 2.1, 2.2 and maybe
even a
3.0.
What would you like to see in Bahamut?
-Aaron
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
** **
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
Actually, we were working on some Facebook integration. It wouldn't necessarily have to tie into the IRCD at all, I think we had envisioned a Facebook App that you could install that would allow you to chat, and also give you some access to the Services features that you'd normally get via users.dal.net. So you might still see that.
B
brandon@dalnet [irc.dal.net] Routing & Peering Team Lead
On 5/27/13 2:10 PM, Asif Ali Baig wrote:
Totally agreed - but I'm afraid that is impossible to do that communication between both entirely different platform work together but if it happens that woul be a great turn for DALnet and its user strength !
Regards,JazzzzzSent from my iPhone
On 27-May-2013, at 10:15 PM, "Vin King" <vin.king@gmail.com mailto:vin.king@gmail.com> wrote:
I'd love to say it was entirely tongue in cheek, but the reality is that IRC has suffered highly as a result of Facebook. Finding a way to integrate the two platforms may rekindle interest.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Dreamhealer <dreamhealer@hotmail.co.uk mailto:dreamhealer@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
__ __ __ __HI____ __ __These things are great to be work with let us have this experience then we will discuss new things later on and yea Vin’s suggestion is good ahahaha. ____ __ __ ____ __ __Regards,____ __ __Jazzzzz____ __ ____ __ __ __*From:* Aaron Wiebe <mailto:epiphani@gmail.com> __ __*Sent:* Monday, May 27, 2013 8:52 Asif__ __*To:* Holbrook Bunting <mailto:srd@powertrip.net> __ __*Cc:* dalnet-src@dal.net <mailto:dalnet-src@dal.net> ; brandon <mailto:brandon@dal.net> __ __*Subject:* Re: [DALnet-src] Re: Recent Bahamut changes______ __ ____ __So this thread has quieted down now. This is what I captured: __- DNSBL integration __ ** Possibly by way of separate access checking daemon __- IRCv3 support __- User Hostmasking __Anything else? ____ __On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Holbrook Bunting __<srd@powertrip.net <mailto:srd@powertrip.net>>__ wrote: Bahamut to a degree has hostmasking already. It's called svshost where a unlined server sets it. Integrating hostmasking into nickserv would be neat. Sent from my iPhone ____ On May 24, 2013, at 6:34, brandon <brandon@DAL.NET <mailto:brandon@DAL.NET>> wrote: > We've gotten some comments/suggestions over the last year or so about > becoming more "IRCv3" compliant...More info available here: > > http://ircv3.atheme.org/ > > And I know we've beaten this to death before, but I'm still very much in > favor of some sort of user hostmasking, whether hash-based in the ircd, > or tied to services - in such a way where staff (and law enforcement if > necessary) would still be able to see real IPs. :) > > Brandon > > > brandon@dalnet [irc.dal.net <http://irc.dal.net>] > Routing & Peering Team Lead > > On 5/24/2013 8:27 AM, Aaron Wiebe wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The bug in 2.0.6 should have been identified in the code review and >> testing phase - and I feel like we got some egg on our face as a >> result. I wanted to take a moment to comment on it, and apologize. >> >> The fact that this bug, being fairly big and obvious, got through the >> process reflects that I've been a bit lax in reviews and testing. I'm >> personally going to change my review and approval process to try to >> resolve these issues, through a more formal off-trunk review. >> >> Bahamut as a project is effectively in a maintenance phase, as we don't >> have anyone working on it as actively as we previously have. We release >> new versions sporadically, and don't have a roadmap or any "next big >> thing". This is actually part of the problem - without goals, we have a >> lot fewer eyes on individual changes, and we're not all driving towards >> anything. >> >> So with that said, I'd like to put it to the community to discuss what >> we could put on our roadmap. Little things and big things. Let's >> brainstorm - what would you like to see in Bahamut? And out of this >> discussion, maybe we can line up a roadmap for 2.1, 2.2 and maybe even a >> 3.0. >> >> What would you like to see in Bahamut? >> >> -Aaron > _______________________________________________ > DALnet-src mailing list > DALnet-src@lists.dal.net <mailto:DALnet-src@lists.dal.net> > https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src _______________________________________________ DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net <mailto:DALnet-src@lists.dal.net> https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src ____ __ __ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net <mailto:DALnet-src@lists.dal.net> https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src ______ _______________________________________________ DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net <mailto:DALnet-src@lists.dal.net> https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
Embedded DNSBL query capabilities to the IRCD would be a nice feature.
Regards, Harry
On 24/5/2013 3:27 ??, Aaron Wiebe wrote:
Hi all,
The bug in 2.0.6 should have been identified in the code review and testing phase - and I feel like we got some egg on our face as a result. I wanted to take a moment to comment on it, and apologize.
The fact that this bug, being fairly big and obvious, got through the process reflects that I've been a bit lax in reviews and testing. I'm personally going to change my review and approval process to try to resolve these issues, through a more formal off-trunk review.
Bahamut as a project is effectively in a maintenance phase, as we don't have anyone working on it as actively as we previously have. We release new versions sporadically, and don't have a roadmap or any "next big thing". This is actually part of the problem - without goals, we have a lot fewer eyes on individual changes, and we're not all driving towards anything.
So with that said, I'd like to put it to the community to discuss what we could put on our roadmap. Little things and big things. Let's brainstorm - what would you like to see in Bahamut? And out of this discussion, maybe we can line up a roadmap for 2.1, 2.2 and maybe even a 3.0.
What would you like to see in Bahamut?
-Aaron
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
Wow, as the guy who has to deal with most of our bopm bots, I second this idea emphatically!!
brandon@dalnet [irc.dal.net] Routing & Peering Team Lead
On 5/24/13 2:34 PM, Charalampos Pournaris wrote:
Embedded DNSBL query capabilities to the IRCD would be a nice feature.
Regards, Harry
On 24/5/2013 3:27 μμ, Aaron Wiebe wrote:
Hi all,
The bug in 2.0.6 should have been identified in the code review and testing phase - and I feel like we got some egg on our face as a result. I wanted to take a moment to comment on it, and apologize.
The fact that this bug, being fairly big and obvious, got through the process reflects that I've been a bit lax in reviews and testing. I'm personally going to change my review and approval process to try to resolve these issues, through a more formal off-trunk review.
Bahamut as a project is effectively in a maintenance phase, as we don't have anyone working on it as actively as we previously have. We release new versions sporadically, and don't have a roadmap or any "next big thing". This is actually part of the problem - without goals, we have a lot fewer eyes on individual changes, and we're not all driving towards anything.
So with that said, I'd like to put it to the community to discuss what we could put on our roadmap. Little things and big things. Let's brainstorm - what would you like to see in Bahamut? And out of this discussion, maybe we can line up a roadmap for 2.1, 2.2 and maybe even a 3.0.
What would you like to see in Bahamut?
-Aaron
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
I've already implemented such feature for a small network (IPv4 enabled queries only) and works great. It has actually reduced droneruns and proxy disturbance quite significantly.
The way it works is like this: when a new connection is received (and before registering it to the ircd) a new DNSBL query is dispatched to all blacklists defined in the ircd.conf. Depending on the replies and whether they match the replies defined in ircd.conf the user is whether killed with a kill message specified for the particular blacklist or the user registration continues normally.
However, with this approach if X is a timeout specified for a DNSBL, then it might take up to X seconds before the user connection can proceed with registration if the DNSBL is down/there are network issues.
Regards, Harry
On 24/5/2013 10:19 μμ, brandon wrote:
Wow, as the guy who has to deal with most of our bopm bots, I second this idea emphatically!!
brandon@dalnet [irc.dal.net] Routing & Peering Team Lead
On 5/24/13 2:34 PM, Charalampos Pournaris wrote:
Embedded DNSBL query capabilities to the IRCD would be a nice feature.
Regards, Harry
On 24/5/2013 3:27 μμ, Aaron Wiebe wrote:
Hi all,
The bug in 2.0.6 should have been identified in the code review and testing phase - and I feel like we got some egg on our face as a result. I wanted to take a moment to comment on it, and apologize.
The fact that this bug, being fairly big and obvious, got through the process reflects that I've been a bit lax in reviews and testing. I'm personally going to change my review and approval process to try to resolve these issues, through a more formal off-trunk review.
Bahamut as a project is effectively in a maintenance phase, as we don't have anyone working on it as actively as we previously have. We release new versions sporadically, and don't have a roadmap or any "next big thing". This is actually part of the problem - without goals, we have a lot fewer eyes on individual changes, and we're not all driving towards anything.
So with that said, I'd like to put it to the community to discuss what we could put on our roadmap. Little things and big things. Let's brainstorm - what would you like to see in Bahamut? And out of this discussion, maybe we can line up a roadmap for 2.1, 2.2 and maybe even a 3.0.
What would you like to see in Bahamut?
-Aaron
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
-
Aaron Wiebe -
Asif Ali Baig -
brandon -
Charalampos Pournaris -
Dreamhealer
-
Holbrook Bunting -
Juan Baez -
Vin King