I'm a bit confused. So these checks are not currently working? I would
assume things would work exactly as Kobi mentions.
--
Bradley Claghorn
Visigoth @ IRC
punch.dal.net outpost
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Kobi Shmueli wrote:
> Coca Cola wrote:
>> 1) +S should be available only for channel opers connected through SSL
>> (In a case of a new channel with one single chanoper).
>
> I agree with that.
>
>> 2) +S should be available for use ONLY if ALL users in the channel are
>> connected through SSL.
>
> How do you suggest we enforce that?
>
>> 3) Invites should NOT over-ride +S and if for any reason someone
>> non-ssl joins, S mode should be removed by the server.
>
> I agree with the /invite part and I also think the +I list shouldn't bypass
> it either. As for the second part, I don't really see the point if servers
> will only allow SSL users to join.
>
>> 4) No exceptions/overrides for /samode. (Perhaps only ulines should
>> override it but at as far as i know ircservices at least "enforce" the
>> mode and kicks out non-ssl users).
>
> I disagree with that, /samode and /sajoin should be able to bypass these
> restrictions.
>
> -Kobi.
> _______________________________________________
> DALnet-src mailing list
> DALnet-src@lists.dal.net
>
https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
>