Totally agreed - but I'm afraid that is impossible to do that communication between both entirely different platform work together but if it happens that woul be a great turn for DALnet and its user strength ! Regards, Jazzzzz Sent from my iPhone On 27-May-2013, at 10:15 PM, "Vin King" <vin.king@gmail.com> wrote:
I'd love to say it was entirely tongue in cheek, but the reality is that IRC has suffered highly as a result of Facebook. Finding a way to integrate the two platforms may rekindle interest.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Dreamhealer <dreamhealer@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
HI These things are great to be work with let us have this experience then we will discuss new things later on and yea Vin’s suggestion is good ahahaha. Regards, Jazzzzz From: Aaron Wiebe Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 8:52 Asif To: Holbrook Bunting Cc: dalnet-src@dal.net ; brandon Subject: Re: [DALnet-src] Re: Recent Bahamut changes So this thread has quieted down now.
This is what I captured:
- DNSBL integration ** Possibly by way of separate access checking daemon - IRCv3 support - User Hostmasking
Anything else?
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Holbrook Bunting <srd@powertrip.net> wrote:
Bahamut to a degree has hostmasking already. It's called svshost where a unlined server sets it. Integrating hostmasking into nickserv would be neat.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 24, 2013, at 6:34, brandon <brandon@DAL.NET> wrote:
We've gotten some comments/suggestions over the last year or so about becoming more "IRCv3" compliant...More info available here:
And I know we've beaten this to death before, but I'm still very much in favor of some sort of user hostmasking, whether hash-based in the ircd, or tied to services - in such a way where staff (and law enforcement if necessary) would still be able to see real IPs. :)
Brandon
brandon@dalnet [irc.dal.net] Routing & Peering Team Lead
On 5/24/2013 8:27 AM, Aaron Wiebe wrote:
Hi all,
The bug in 2.0.6 should have been identified in the code review and testing phase - and I feel like we got some egg on our face as a result. I wanted to take a moment to comment on it, and apologize.
The fact that this bug, being fairly big and obvious, got through the process reflects that I've been a bit lax in reviews and testing. I'm personally going to change my review and approval process to try to resolve these issues, through a more formal off-trunk review.
Bahamut as a project is effectively in a maintenance phase, as we don't have anyone working on it as actively as we previously have. We release new versions sporadically, and don't have a roadmap or any "next big thing". This is actually part of the problem - without goals, we have a lot fewer eyes on individual changes, and we're not all driving towards anything.
So with that said, I'd like to put it to the community to discuss what we could put on our roadmap. Little things and big things. Let's brainstorm - what would you like to see in Bahamut? And out of this discussion, maybe we can line up a roadmap for 2.1, 2.2 and maybe even a 3.0.
What would you like to see in Bahamut?
-Aaron
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
_______________________________________________ DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src
_______________________________________________ DALnet-src mailing list DALnet-src@lists.dal.net https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src