December 2015 - DALnet-src

Re: s_err.c: Standardize 256 (RPL_ADMINME) with RFC 1459
by Juuso Lapinlampi 29 Dec '15

29 Dec '15

> Thanks Juuso - beyond the RFC issue, have you run into any cases of > this causing problems with clients? Hi Aaron. Let's assume this is the raw conversation, compliant with RFC 1459: ADMIN :irc.se.partyvan.eu 256 * irc.se.partyvan.eu :Administrative info :irc.se.partyvan.eu 257 * :Stockholm, Sweden :irc.se.partyvan.eu 258 * :Partyvan NOC :irc.se.partyvan.eu 259 * :noc@partyvan.eu I've tested this a little and so far found a minor regression with weechat 1.3: -- | irc.se.partyvan.eu :Administrative info -- | Stockholm, Sweden -- | Partyvan NOC -- | noc(a)partyvan.eu I've heard ZNC also has the same little regression: * irc.se.partyvan.eu :Administrative info * Stockholm, Sweden * Partyvan NOC * noc(a)partyvan.eu irssi 0.8.17 works perfectly fine! 15:03 -!- irc.se.partyvan.eu Administrative info 15:03 -!- Stockholm, Sweden 15:03 -!- Partyvan NOC 15:03 -!- noc(a)partyvan.eu I've not tested with HexChat, XChat or other IRC clients yet, but I'm interested to hear about them too. I intend to send patches to IRC client developers for major IRC clients which do not follow the RFC syntax, but I've not yet had time to do so. Of course, it would be interesting to get every IRC client and server closer to the standards and help with future adaptation for a new, up to date IRC standard (IRCv3? Harmony?). For what it's worth, this is the progress on different IRC server daemons: - Charybdis: Merged (e0160ec5a4cbd855751571824a0dbf93aae29790) - nefarious2: Merged (5dce7c3a7c1e08b4d68de78a764af83d6e217375) - InspIRCd: Intent to merge (after fixing a parameter issue) - UnrealIRCd: wontfix (bug tracker #4519) - Bahamut: You are here Other IRCds I've not yet looked into, but will try to do so tomorrow. DBoyz also did some testing before anything was merged. It seems different IRCds use(d) different non-standard 256 replies: bahamut-2.0.7 <- :arcor.de.eu.dal.net 256 DBoyz :Administrative info about arcor.de.eu.dal.net charybdis-3.5.0-rc1 <- :irc-us3.alphachat.net 256 DBoyz :Administrative info about irc-us3.alphachat.net InspIRCd-2.0 <- :lazer.techtronix.net 256 DBoyz :Administrative info for lazer.techtronix.net u2.10.12.14+Nefarious(2.0.0) <- :Baltimore.MD.US.ExileNET.Org 256 DBoyz :Administrative info about Baltimore.MD.US.ExileNET.Org UnrealIRCd-4.0.0 <- :irc.blockah.com 256 DBoyz :Administrative info about irc.blockah.com I also checked the CVS history of Undernet's ircu. The non-standard "Administrative info about <server>" string has been there since the initial commit in year 1999 - so I found no reason why they would have changed it away from the standard.

1 0

s_err.c: Standardize 256 (RPL_ADMINME) with RFC 1459
by Juuso Lapinlampi 29 Dec '15

29 Dec '15

>From d412ebf6feea74cdd5ff02a7921b1d4807c2c983 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Juuso Lapinlampi <wub(a)partyvan.eu> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 04:34:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] s_err.c: Standardize 256 (RPL_ADMINME) with RFC 1459 RPL_ADMINME is a response the client receives using the ADMIN command. Bahamut used to implement a non-standard version of this. The RFC 1459 standard [1] says in section "6.2 Command responses.": 256 RPL_ADMINME "<server> :Administrative info" This commit corrects the behavior to follow the standard. [1]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1459 --- src/s_err.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/s_err.c b/src/s_err.c index 075e172..073a7ba 100644 --- a/src/s_err.c +++ b/src/s_err.c @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static char *replies[] = /* 253 RPL_LUSERUNKNOWN */ ":%s 253 %s %d :unknown connection(s)", /* 254 RPL_LUSERCHANNELS */ ":%s 254 %s %d :channels formed", /* 255 RPL_LUSERME */ ":%s 255 %s :I have %d clients and %d servers", - /* 256 RPL_ADMINME */ ":%s 256 %s :Administrative info about %s", + /* 256 RPL_ADMINME */ ":%s 256 %s %s :Administrative info", /* 257 RPL_ADMINLOC1 */ ":%s 257 %s :%s", /* 258 RPL_ADMINLOC2 */ ":%s 258 %s :%s", /* 259 RPL_ADMINEMAIL */ ":%s 259 %s :%s", -- 2.6.4

2 1

Re: DALnet-src Digest, Vol 54, Issue 1
by mirckid . 16 Dec '15

16 Dec '15

thanks for contact DALnet-src, for frozen nick please use DALnet contact form at https://users.dal.net/karnaf/new.php or email the services abuse at sabuse(a)dal.net best regards On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:00 AM, <dalnet-src-request(a)lists.dal.net> wrote: > Send DALnet-src mailing list submissions to > dalnet-src(a)lists.dal.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > dalnet-src-request(a)lists.dal.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > dalnet-src-owner(a)lists.dal.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of DALnet-src digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. [SPAM] My Nick is Frozen (Syed Adnan Shah) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 18:59:21 +0000 (UTC) > From: Syed Adnan Shah <shahsyedadnan(a)yahoo.com> > Subject: [DALnet-src] [SPAM] My Nick is Frozen > To: "dalnet(a)dal.net" <dalnet(a)dal.net>, "dalnet-services(a)dal.net" > <dalnet-services(a)dal.net>, "dalnet-src(a)dal.net" < > dalnet-src(a)dal.net> > Message-ID: > <2104143256.11264427.1448823561788.JavaMail.yahoo(a)mail.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part > -------------- > Spam detection software, running on the system "momomail.dal.net", has > identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message > has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label > similar future email. If you have any questions, see > the administrator of that system for details. > > Content preview: Dear Sir/Ma'am!with due respect it is submitted that I m > regular > , permanent registered user of prestigious network i.e. DAL.NET with > nick > "Moody__Chatter" but from some days i am not signing in /login and > message > is received Â that your nick is frozen , abuse. Respected Senior, kindly > inform me what is the problem and what is the fault on my part i shall > improve > my deficiencies. ThanksÂ [...] > > Content analysis details: (5.6 points, 5.0 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- > -------------------------------------------------- > 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail > provider > (jbarik113[at]gmail.com) > (deception767[at]att.net) > (pintrill[at]gmail.com) > (shahsyedadnan[at]yahoo.com) > (shahsyedadnan[at]yahoo.com) > (shahsyedadnan[at]yahoo.com) > 0.8 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) > 1.6 FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 'From' yahoo.com does not match 'Received' > headers > 2.0 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)' > -0.5 CUSTOM_IRC_DOWNSCORE BODY: dal.net IRC custom word whitelist > 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message > 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% > [score: 0.5000] > -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from > author's > domain > 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not > necessarily valid > -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK > signature > 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with > dynamic-looking rDNS > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > DALnet-src mailing list > DALnet-src(a)lists.dal.net > https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-src > > > End of DALnet-src Digest, Vol 54, Issue 1 > ***************************************** > -- ervan @ DALnet

1 0