On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Kobi Shmueli <kobi@dal.net> wrote:
Michael Reynolds wrote:
I'd like to know the thought process on this decision. It makes about
as much sense as spitting into the wind. How does the founder
willingly handing the channel to another invoke the thought "Ok, let's
make sure this founder cannot remain part of the channel in any
fashion after handing the channel over to another person"?

How exactly stoping *current* founders from being added to SOP/AOP/AKICK lists (while they are listed as the channel founder) make "founder cannot remian part of the channel in any fashion after handing the channel over to another person"? what's stopping them from being added to any list after the founder's nick has changed?

-Kobi.
_______________________________________________
DALnet-services mailing list
DALnet-services@lists.dal.net
https://lists.dal.net/mailman/listinfo/dalnet-services

I'm still not entirely certain on the specific need to prevent founders from being on the access lists.