18 Feb
2010
18 Feb
'10
3:41 p.m.
Michael Reynolds wrote:
I'd like to know the thought process on this decision. It makes about as much sense as spitting into the wind. How does the founder willingly handing the channel to another invoke the thought "Ok, let's make sure this founder cannot remain part of the channel in any fashion after handing the channel over to another person"?
How exactly stoping *current* founders from being added to SOP/AOP/AKICK lists (while they are listed as the channel founder) make "founder cannot remian part of the channel in any fashion after handing the channel over to another person"? what's stopping them from being added to any list after the founder's nick has changed? -Kobi.