18 Feb
2010
18 Feb
'10
3:30 p.m.
I'd like to know the thought process on this decision. It makes about as much sense as spitting into the wind. How does the founder willingly handing the channel to another invoke the thought "Ok, let's make sure this founder cannot remain part of the channel in any fashion after handing the channel over to another person"? DALnet's made some weird but logical decisions in the past (luserslock, fake server list, etc), but this one has me completely baffled.